Within per webpages, we gathered step one,000 profiles out of heterosexual men and 1,000 profiles out of heterosexual lady. Profiles try to find profiles through geographical location, ages, and you will gender filter systems.
To make sure a geographical dispersion out of users, we chosen equivalent amounts of profiles out-of four big metropolitan areas plus metropolitan, suburban, and you can outlying elements: La, Denver, Chicago, Atlanta, and you can New york. We at random selected zip rules away from each one of the five section to search for pages. Inside each zip code, each gender, we up coming randomly selected users one of five age range: very early more youthful adulthood (aged 1829 ages; n = 1,000; Yards = , SD = step three.17), late young adulthood/early midlife (aged 3049 age; n = 1,000; Yards = , SD = 5.61), later midlife (aged 5064 years; n = 1,000; Meters = , SD = 3.99), and you can older adults (aged more than 65 many years; letter = 1,000; M = , SD = cuatro.29). I put this type of stratifications to assure a complete age range from relationships users inside the sampling. Given that older adults category you may need around three decades, i treated age while the a continuous changeable unlike as a group varying within the analyses.
Out of per character, i removed: gender, years, ethnicity, and the About Me or During my Conditions totally free response point. In order to guarantee anonymity of profile writers, we did not obtain a lot more demographic advice (e.g., training, spiritual choice, income) which will serve as distinguishing advice. Brand new sampling system is portrayed inside the Additional Appendix A .
The fresh try varied for the ages from 18 to help you 95 many years. A different t-try found zero difference in imply ages for females japancupid (Yards = , SD = ) and you will dudes (M = , SD = ). New writeup on ethnicity from the shot is actually 70% White/Caucasian, 11% Black/Ebony, 7% Hispanic/Latino, 2% Asian, and 10% combined battle/other.
Profile articles

I utilized the LIWC application to analyze the message of your pages. This program works out new volume and you can dimensions of particular categories of words within this a text file. The newest LIWC program measures up for every single word of a text file having an inside dictionary in excess of 4,five hundred words assigned to keyword classes. This study drew for the 11 oriented LIWC classes: first-people one pronouns, first-individual plural pronouns, family unit members, members of the family, works, end, money, wellness, sexuality, positive feelings, and you can negative feeling. Table step 1 contains example terms inside the each of the LIWC class (to learn more off these types of codes, find LIWC, 2007).
We as well as authored a category of terms to own appeal unavailable into the founded LIWC classes. I implemented measures getting build from LIWC categories ( Tausczik & Pennebaker, 2010) by the producing a comprehensive variety of terms and conditions out-of dictionaries, thesauruses, surveys out-of prior look, and you will terms and conditions generated by the analysis group. Next, i chosen 25 words most representative out of elegance according to appearance from inside the thesauruses and you may fellow member responses (e.g., precious, good-appearing, good-looking, hot). This new elegance category is nearly totally different from the brand new sexual category, in just that overlapping phrase (sexy). Instances on attractiveness classification also are utilized in Dining table step one; into done range of words on the attractiveness category, discover Secondary Table 1 .
Analytic Method
I very first examined descriptive statistics towards proportions of terminology anyone of different years utilized in their dating users. We including made illustrative numbers depicting typically the most popular terms and conditions.
I after that looked to hypothesis review having fun with normal least squares regression. The outcome variables within this data were the fresh new proportion off terminology suitable each of the twelve groups from the LIWC analyses. The fresh new LIWC kinds have been every surely skewed considering the number out of zero values (i.elizabeth., new member did not play with any conditions in the classification). I ran per research with a square-sources conversion process (used to address non-normality inside the past knowledge using the LIWC; DeAndrea, Shaw & Levine, 2010; Hirsh & Peterson, 2009). The fresh new trend off findings is comparable shortly after using the changes. Getting easier interpretation, results is actually exhibited with the untransformed LIWC class data. Brand new independent variable was ages, managed just like the a continuing adjustable. I and additionally integrated gender.